Editor© Muhammad Haque
2140 Hrs GMT 2240 Hrs UK Time London Wednesday 7 May 2008: KHOODEELAAR! can confirm that neither Alexander is to be trusted when it comes to matters o constitutional conduct in the UK… While Wendy Alexander prepares to do her latest worst to sink Gordon Brown – who was exposed as being either naive or very incompetent over what Wendy had done in the previous 24 hours – her brother, ‘another’ ‘close’ ally of Gordon Brown’s has been making waves by allegedly speaking to Rupert Murdoch’s agents on, of all things, ‘implied ethicality….. and using words like ‘outrageous’ to describe his sister Wendy’s interventions about the redrawing of the unwritten UK constitution…… Douglas Alexander of course was making whatever comments he was making on the record about Wendy Alexander in order that he, Douglas, would be seen by the brooding Gordon as the ‘correct’ Alexander….at least for the duration of the remainder of Brown’s reigns as the man who can affect one’s career…..
The KHOODEELAAR! campaign has been publishing [for 4 years plus] various updated versions of the state of our constitutional law acton programme to get the CRASSRAil hole plot to be scrapped…. And if not altogether scrapped, to at least force the regime to drop those parts of the scam that has a series of holes to be dug across the Khoodeelaar! campaign area in the East End of London…..
No to “corrupt behaviour in the UK parliament…..” CAMPAIGN TOLD YOU SO! about the lack of morality, ethics, transparency, constitutionality on the part of Douglas Alexander! Just under a year ago, on 13 June 2007, Khoodeelaar ! had written to then Crossrail hole plot Minister Douglas Alexander [‘the Secretary of State’ at the UK Department ‘for’!!!! Transport] and we had done so as part of our constitutional law acton programme in the UK domestic courts system….
Accordingly we wrote to Douglas Alexander to give us a decision-letter. In legal practice, a ‘decision-letter is a concise piece of evidence that can be used in court to show the irrationality, the illogicality, the idiocy of the given decision-maker.
Douglas Alexander of course did not send us anything. Yes. He has been THAT empty of substance. and totally bereft of ethics and morality. And wed cans ay emphatically, he has been brazenly ignorant about constitutionality. So he failed to answer any of the questions. Or to address the updated legal and constitutional questionnaire that we put to him.
We publish the substance of what wed had put to the outrageously opportunistic and empty Douglas Alexander in June 2007:
“
To recap on our previous legal and constitutional law questions:
1. We have asked you to substantiate the assertion that the ‘Crossrail Bill’ is compatible with the European Conventions
2. We have asked you on more than a 100 separate written and other verifiable occasions to substantiate the assertions made by the CLRL company and by other persons including by those from your DfT Crossrail team that ‘Crossrail will bring benefits’ to the East End of London. We have asked you to show what benefits would be brought to the area when it is going to be destroyed, disrupted and the environment and the social equilibrium being so fundamentally disrupted.
3. We have asked you to show why the alignment was decided to be brought through the E1 area
4. We have asked what evidence you had to justify the digging of the Crossrail hole/s in the E1 area
5. We have asked you to show what economic, social, environmental Demand there was – or even now has been – in the London E1 area for a Crossrail line, for a Crossrail station at Whitechapel
6. We have asked you dozens of other questions.
7. We have asked you to scrap the Crossrail Bill as it is, [=in its present substantive form] because it is not compatible with the ECHR Conventions and it is not needed by the local economy or by the local community or by the local environment.
8. We have asked you to scrap the Crossrail Bill because it is not cost-effective and is not going to raise the economic capacity or ability of the ordinary population in the Brick Lane, Whitechapel and Stepney London E1 area and because the costs will far outstrip any returns. As have been shown in the analyses of the ‘Crossrail project’ made by all the independent economists and transport specialists in the context of the London transport situation……”
”
[To be continued]
