0855 Hrs GMT London Thursday 29 January 2009: KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That the Crassly conceived London Crossrail was also CRASSLY peddled. NO truth in the hype they do. No ethics. No logic. This applies across the board to the behaviour of every single one o the peddlers of the Big Business crassly conceived scam.. In the case o the Guardian, which has a historic and ‘congenital’ problem with identifying with the truth, CRASSrail is the ‘appropriate’ vehicle to express the Guardian’s twisted stance on the truth…When the Guardian ‘media group’ [what Group!, it apes the Daily Mail…] does anything about any local councils, it does so by looking at the in come from advertising revenue that it craves and quite often receives [more often than the DAILY MAIL to be sure] from local councils… Most of the times, the Guardian peddles a line that ends up accommodating and promoting the local Councils. This makes it impossible for the Guardian to claim to be interested in let alone actually practising ‘journalism’ that is contributing to the upholding of the truth in the given circumstance.… When the LYING Guardian performed a racist, tokenistic one-off piece of reporting on the community’s opposition to the Crossrail hole-scam, it sent an alleged journalist to talk to people in Brick Lane…These Guardian was only able to find one person whom it quoted in a contrived way and failed to give most of the information that affects the costs, the purpose, the transport relevance, and the economic and environmental implications of the CRASSRail scam or about the community in the London E1 area.….. But then the Guardian, being the lying symbol of the ‘mainstream’ media in Britain, has a long history of lying about the area and in this context lying about the Bangladeshi community… On every single occasion that the lying Guardian has published anything about the Bangladeshis, it has got the facts wrong. It has got the evidence wrong. And it has ended up aiding and abetting those that are manifestly, demonstrably and objectively at odds and are inconsistent w with the social, the moral, the historic, the linguistic, the cultural and the democratic and the human rights of the community…

0855 Hrs GMT London Thursday 29 January 2009: KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That the Crassly conceived London Crossrail was also CRASSLY peddled. NO truth in the hype they do. No ethics. No logic. This applies across the board to the behaviour of every single one o the peddlers of the Big Business crassly conceived scam.. In the case o the Guardian, which has a historic and ‘congenital’ problem with identifying with the truth, CRASSrail is the ‘appropriate’ vehicle to express the Guardian’s twisted stance on the truth…When the Guardian ‘media group’ [what Group!, it apes the Daily Mail…] does anything about any local councils, it does so by looking at the in come from advertising revenue that it craves and quite often receives [more often than the DAILY MAIL to be sure] from local councils… Most of the times, the Guardian peddles a line that ends up accommodating and promoting the local Councils. This makes it impossible for the Guardian to claim to be interested in let alone actually practising ‘journalism’ that is  contributing to the upholding of the truth in the given circumstance.… When the LYING Guardian performed a racist, tokenistic one-off piece of reporting on the community’s opposition to the Crossrail hole-scam, it sent an alleged journalist to talk to people in Brick Lane…These Guardian was only able to find one person whom it quoted in a contrived way and failed to give most of the information that affects the costs, the purpose, the transport relevance, and the economic and environmental implications of the CRASSRail scam or about the community in the London E1 area.….. But then the Guardian, being the lying symbol of the ‘mainstream’ media in Britain, has a long history of lying about the area and in this context lying about the Bangladeshi community… On every single occasion that the lying Guardian has published anything about the Bangladeshis, it has got the facts wrong. It has got the evidence wrong. And it has ended up aiding and abetting those that are manifestly, demonstrably and objectively at odds and are inconsistent w with the social, the moral, the historic, the linguistic, the cultural and the democratic and the human rights of the community…

 

[To be continued]

_____________________________________________________

 

0720 Hrs GMT London Thursday 29 January 2009: KHOODEELAAR! TOLD YOU SO! That the Crassly conceived London Crossrail was also CRASSLY peddled. NO truth in the hype they do. No ethics. No logic

 

 

KHOODEELAAR! Quoting

 

http://londoncityairportfighttheflights.blogspot.com/2009/01/guardian-picks-up-our-crossrail-story.html

 

Quoting from:

 

 

Wednesday, 28 January 2009

  

The Guardian – Picks up our Crossrail story on London City Airport

  

Nice to see that Paul Vidal, reporter of the Eco Soundings column in The Guardian today, has picked up our story on the whingeing London City Airport petitioning against Crossrail.

This won’t go down well with the LCA PR – more negative, but factual information about London City Airport out there in the public domain, what next? Freedom of speech, of the press and democracy? LCA better get the chill pills out! Don’t forget LCA are upset, because they feel it’s their human right to enjoy their business ‘peacefully’! It’s got nothing to do with the competition of another transport system which might take some of their custom away from jets and put it onto high speed trains of course!

January 28, 2009 The Guardian

Off the rails
Crossrail, the east-west rail line soon to be built through London, has been welcomed by commuters, government and business. But three organisations have now petitioned the House of Lords, complaining about the noise and pollution that could occur during its construction. One is London City Airport, which runs the airport, another is London City airport’s freeholder, and the third is London City airport’s leaseholder. FYI: London City airport wants to increase flights from the airport by 50% – flying in the face of many complaints about its own noise and pollution.