0815 [0806] [0732] 0708] [0656]
[0105] Hrs GMT]
London “U.K.”
Saturday
25 April 2020.
We have said,
this Movement
Defending the
Community
by upholding
Universal Ethical values
has said,
strictly on the facts
and for decades,
that “Private Eye”
the so-called satirical magazine,
is a racist organ.
That the racism of “Private Eye”
is made worse,
if racism can be made worse,
by the deeply
anti-Muslim hatred and denial
on the parts of
Ian Pissoff and Francis Swine.
Ian Pissoff
and
Francis Swine:
We have edited the two last names of the
de facto editors and agenda setters
Ian Hislop and Francis Wheen.
We have done this Strictly according to
the same linguistic
dexterity used by the “organ” itself, even though
our movement had been independently actively
using wider and in some contexts comparable
linguistic and nomenclatural
devices since way before the actual
launch in 1961
of
“Private Eye” as an outlet/title/organ.
In 1961, neither the Pissoff nor the Swine
could have been involved at the outlet
which they took control of after Richard
ingrams ended the role in the mid 1980s
The published years
of their births are:
Francis Swine 1957 = the Swine is aged 63ish this year
Ian Pissoff 1960 = the Pissoff is aged 60ish this year
We note that the anti
Muslim agenda of
“Private Eye”
extends to the magazine’s
hatred, denial of the rights
of other faith and
religious communities, eg the Sikhs.
The Hindus, the Israelis, the Jewish
Groups are treated by “Private Eye”
as “legitimate, normal and above reproach”.
What drives the
anti-Muslim racists
at “private eye”
is in the current context
found in the published evidence
exhibited in that organ’s
Comprehensive, wide-ranging
hatred of Jeremy Corbyn.
By wide-ranging, we refer to
the cartoons, the “joke” column
the “journalism” about “British Politics”.
Everything “Private Eye” has published
Featuring Corbyn has been infkuehced
by the sane Agenda.
That Corbyn is not an anti-Muslim spewer
has been treated by “Private Eye” as proof
that Corbyn is unfit to hold high political office
in Britain.
We say this independently.
We ourselves condemn Corbyn
over many of his political
failings but we do not,
never have nor ever intended to hate
Corbyn.
There is a very important
evidential,
factual, moral
and political difference
between our critical
analysis and condemnation of
Corbyn and hating him.
We never intended
to either say anything hateful
against him let alone condone
any hateful views or acts
against him.
However, looking at the contents
of “Private Eye”
during the entirety of the
years beginning
with Corbyn’s nominal
nomination for the leadership of
the UK Labour Party and his years
in that post, one thing that stands
out most clearly is the persistence
with which “Private Eye” copied
the Murdoch SCUM insinuations
and lies against Corbyn whom
“Private Eye” regularly defamed
by running twisted pieces mainly
by repeating the charge that
Corbyn was a terrorist or terrorism
sympathiser.
We have said that Corbyn is
intellectually
challenged on most things.
We shall never conclude
on that basis that
Corbyn is a criminal inciter.
But “Private Eye”
has done that
every time it has published
or repeated
the claim published by
Murdoch-ed SCUM or elsewhere
in the Rupert Murdich-owned
and controlled
operations of the “MSM”
or by the Daily Mail Group
or the Daily Express or the
Daily TorridBorisJohnsonGraph
that Corbyn was just
the same as a terrorist.
Khoodeelaar! the East London 'No to Crossrail hole Bill' Campaign 